Blogs and Stories

Reza Aslan

Stiffing the Revolutionaries

Barack Obama Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images Obama may be cutting off money for groups that promote democracy for Iran, but Reza Aslan says he and most other young Iranians struggling for change there are glad the U.S. is keeping its measly $85 million.

In 2006, after Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice asked Congress to transfer $85 million into the Iran Democracy Fund to, as she put it, “promote political change inside Iran” (translation: bring down the Iranian regime), I made a visit to the plush offices of National Iranian Television (NITV) in Los Angeles to find out how some of the tens of millions of dollars the U.S. had been giving to various Iranian dissident and human-rights groups was being spent.

NITV is one of a dozen Persian satellite stations that broadcast from poorly lit and garishly furnished studios in Westwood and Beverly Hills—a region California’s huge Iranian Diaspora refers to as “Tehrangeles”—into millions of households across Iran. Such stations have already received millions of dollars in American taxpayers' money and would stand to benefit even more from the media propaganda campaign that was being developed by the Bush administration.

Inside the studios of NITV, I met with the station’s founder, Zia Atabay, an Iranian-American businessman and former pop star in pre-revolutionary Iran. With his broad, regal forehead, penetrating eyes, and startlingly black toupee, Atabay is an intimidating figure. He told me he had initially begun NITV as a business venture, but quickly recognized that he had a powerful stage on which to incite revolution and regime change in Iran.

“I want to show [Iranians] that their country is a prison,” he told me in his reserved yet booming voice.

Many of the people the Iran Democracy Fund was supposed to support—the human-rights activists and democracy promoters toiling inside Iran—wholeheartedly welcomed Obama’s decision.

Satellite dishes are technically forbidden in Iran, but even the poorest neighborhoods swarm with shiny white disks jutting from rooftops or tucked into gardens. Every once in a while, the authorities make a sweep of the cities, collecting the dishes and fining their owners. It only takes a day or so for the dishes to crop up again. Often, they are sold back to their previous owners by the authorities who confiscated them in the first place.

The dilemma for most Iranians is that the country’s national television is so mind-numbingly dull, so insufferably pedantic, and so rife with propaganda as to be virtually unwatchable. Not surprisingly, satellite stations have become the sole outlet in Iran for quality Persian-language entertainment.

The stations provide the most wildly eclectic programming, blending a steady stream of news, political talk, music videos, and advice programs designed to feed on the nationalism and nostalgia of disaffected Iranians. As I sat in Atabay’s offices, talking about Iran, I kept a furtive eye on the live feed from the NITV studio. A serious political talk show with a group of former monarchists and political exiles had just given way to a music video featuring a hairy-chested young Iranian-American pop star crooning a vacuous love song while grinding on two scantily clad girls in an L.A. nightclub.

Atabay makes no apologies for his station’s programming. On the contrary, he makes it quite clear that his goal is to tempt Iran’s youth with the frills of American freedom so that they will rise up and topple the clerical regime.

“They want to live like you in America,” Atabay said of young Iranians. “They want to live like European young people. And when they see the free world through us—through television, and radio, and other networks—how other young people can wear whatever they want, do whatever they want to do… they will start fighting for their freedom.”

Gary Sick: Inside Iran’s Intimidation Campaign

Michael Adler: Iran’s Shell Game
With millions of viewers inside Iran, satellite stations like NITV wield enormous influence. And yet conversations with the young Iranians who view these stations yield expressions of gratitude (“I love the new Mansour video!”) mixed with utter contempt, even mockery, of the anti-Islamic republic propaganda the stations offer. It is not that these young Iranians do not loathe their regime as much as the Zia Atabays of the world do. The thought of risking their lives to bring down a brutal regime because a millionaire Iranian living in a mansion in Beverly Hills told them to do so is too laughable to be taken seriously.

Back to Top
October 27, 2009 | 1:31am
Facebook
|
Twitter
|
Digg
|
|
Emails
|
print
Comments ()

LutfiUSMC

I'm glad that we have an adult in planning our foreign policy toward Iran, and we can do more damage if we see to interfere in the internal affair in Iran, and that would give the nut job the reason to be more stupid than they have been, who soon we forget the GWB mind set.

|
|
Reply
8:08 am, Oct 27, 2009

DevilsLawyer

Finally some nuance, intelligence, and responsibility in foreign policy! Thanks for the insight, Mr. Aslan.

|
|
Reply
3:23 pm, Oct 27, 2009

kayjay

My understanding was that the figure was closer to $400 million, instead of $85 million -- maybe $85 million a year?

(http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/2218623/Georg e-W-Bush-raised-400-million-for-action-against-Iran.html)

|
|
Reply
7:40 pm, Oct 27, 2009

Karuna

I still don't understand.

If we don't want Iran to make nuclear weapons why don't we apologize for the Shah and his SAVAK the CIA, according to former Chief CIA Iran Analyst Jesse Leaf, taught Nazi torture techniques to?

Or couldn't our country do something to at least teach and remind it's people what the US and Britain did there and then decide whether we need to apologize or atone?

Also, considering we're the only country who voted "no" (out of a162 nations--Israel abstained, 160 voted "yes") to having UN sanctioned talks about the prevention of an arms race in outer space (PAROS) they can make an absolutely legitimate argument that they're just protecting themselves from the great beast that is our military-industrial complex (DoD, Joint Forces, the people who own the means to produce weaponry and technologies, NSA, CIA, World Bank, etc.).

Obama's said he's going to make a ban on putting weapons in space, but so far he's done nothing. Reuters said his defense review would be completed by September (didn't hear anything) and a space report in December of this year.

And shouldn't we probably apologize for selling Sadam those chemicals that burned the inside of children's lungs?

"the greatest purveyor of violence today -- my own government."
-Rev. & Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

http://obrag.org/?p=4099

***

What am I failing to see here?

|
|
Reply
10:17 pm, Oct 27, 2009

mcmchugh99

If there is going to be regime change in Iran, the people there are going to have to do it for themselves. I just don't see any way around that fact and never have. And regime change would be good for Iran and the rest of the world, as long as the Iranians were in change of the process.

I have never thought anything else for the last thirty years except that the current regime in Iran is an Islamic fascist police state, but I am under no illusions about teh Iranians having any great affections for the United States. Obviously, they do not.

In any event, it's not as if we can afford to go around changing regimes any more. We have fired our last bolt in that respect, and are a bankrupt superpower that is in chronic danger of sliding into another Great Depression. Nor would we know what to do with Iran even if we were in control of it.

|
|
Reply
12:09 pm, Oct 28, 2009

RockerR

The author appears to make a general comment about "shuttering" funding for the Orwellian-named National Endowment for Democracy (NED). To be clear, Obama's 2009 budget marked the highest ever amount given toward NED's nefarious purposes ($115 million), while for FY 2010 they are still budgeted at $100 million, the second highest historical amount. More broadly, 'democracy' funding for FY2010 is $2.81 billion, an overall increase of $234 million, by far eclipsing anything allotted for Bush's (equally Orwellian) 'freedom agenda.' [Source: the CIA-linked Freedom House analysis of 2010 budget request: http://www.freedomhouse.org/uploads/FY2010BudgetAnalysis.pdf]

|
|
Reply
3:02 pm, Nov 11, 2009
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments

Stiffing the Revolutionaries

Emails
|
print
Single Page
|
text
-
+
Facebook
 | 
Twitter
 | 
Digg
 |